One stabilizer that came up often in my research is CoreMelt’s Lock&Load. Unfortunately, however, fine grain control (like the ability to choose the stabilization area, or the ability to adjust stabilization in a specific axis) just isn’t there. Surprisingly, FCP X’s IntertiaCam stabilizer is pretty good at working its magic on hyperlapses. It’s really a no-brainer – even if you hate the Magnetic Timeline. Adobe Premiere is great, but for $299, Apple’s Final Cut Pro X is an excellent non-linear editor you can install on multiple computers. And, in fact, there is – if you’re a Mac user (yes, I said cheaper and mac user.) Alternativesįirst: the editor. “ There just has to be an alternative”, I thought – as I set about finding a cheaper way. For those who are paying Adobe’s $9.99 subscription fee, however, the question is: does it make sense to up the payment to $49.99 per month just to create hyperlapses? In a word: no – especially for your typical hobbyist or semipro photographer. Many are even content to stay on Photoshop CS6 while paying annually for the latest version of Lightroom. Most photographers are paying $9.99 a month for Photoshop and Lightroom. You really want the stabilizer in Premiere or After Effects.Īll this sounds great, until you do the math. Yah, you can use other stabilizers, but they’re just OK.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |